<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday: How Layout Improves White Papers</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Word Wrangler</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58548</link>
		<dc:creator>The Word Wrangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58548</guid>
		<description>True, very true. But I've also seen some sales letters and direct response pieces that were pretty ugly, but had high conversion rates. And look at Drudge. That's one ugly site, but the number of hits he gets is astounding.  I think that it's best if you go for great copy PLUS great layout. You really can't lose with that combo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, very true. But I&#8217;ve also seen some sales letters and direct response pieces that were pretty ugly, but had high conversion rates. And look at Drudge. That&#8217;s one ugly site, but the number of hits he gets is astounding.  I think that it&#8217;s best if you go for great copy PLUS great layout. You really can&#8217;t lose with that combo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58546</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58546</guid>
		<description>Hey there WW;

While I agree that content rules, a smart writer knows that great writing can be hindered by poor layout.

Think about those one-page paragraphs in you read college textbooks...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there WW;</p>
<p>While I agree that content rules, a smart writer knows that great writing can be hindered by poor layout.</p>
<p>Think about those one-page paragraphs in you read college textbooks&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Word Wrangler</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58545</link>
		<dc:creator>The Word Wrangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2008/02/11/white-paper-layout/#comment-58545</guid>
		<description>I'll have to listen to this. A few years ago - as a graphic designer - I would've told you that it's all about the layout. It was the visual presentation that sold. Now that I'm a "born again writer" I realize that it's the content baby! (My apologies to Dick Vitale). I still think copy trumps design, but you're better off when both are working together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to listen to this. A few years ago - as a graphic designer - I would&#8217;ve told you that it&#8217;s all about the layout. It was the visual presentation that sold. Now that I&#8217;m a &#8220;born again writer&#8221; I realize that it&#8217;s the content baby! (My apologies to Dick Vitale). I still think copy trumps design, but you&#8217;re better off when both are working together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.302 seconds -->
