Why ‘Going Blind’ is Best for Expert Interviews
By Michael Stelzner“The best stuff lives in someone else’s head,” I explained to an attentive class.
When it comes to finding content for writing projects, there are really two approaches:
#1: Search like crazy: This involves spending hours on the Internet, reading hundreds of pages of documents and filtering the good from the slop.
#2: Interview people in the know: This approach is greatly streamlined. Basically you get on the phone with the experts and ask the right questions. You are in and out in 60 minutes or less.
If you want to get at the right information rapidly, might I suggest approach number two.
When I am interviewing an expert, say a vice president of a major corporation, I do no prior research before the interview.
WHAT you ask?
Yes, that is right, I literally go in blind.
And, I do this every single day.
WARNING: If you do not know how to ask good questions and quickly engage a person, you should read the link above in this article.
So here is my strategy and why it really works:
Let’s say you are working on a big project, like a white paper.
You know you need to talk to people to understand the topic and write about as if you were the expert.
My approach is to break the project into a series of interviews based on topic. For example, you might talk about the history section one call and perhaps a list of benefits on another.
Rather than reading all the documents that the company has already published, you should simply get a high level overview of the project topic and then arrange time with the experts.
By NOT reading the materials provided by your client (not yet at least), you:
- Improve the likelihood of digesting every word that comes from the interview
- Are more likely to ask probing follow-on questions
- Get some great ideas for use in your work
- Eliminate the likelihood of simply rewriting what has already been written
- Greatly speed the research process
- Have a chance to ask your expert specifically what you should read (after your interview)
- Develop a sense of commitment to the project with the experts
- Speed the reading process (when the interviews are done, you have a narrowed focus)
Be warned that your clients may not appreciate or see the wisdom in this approach right off the bat. However, if they stick with your process, they will be pleasantly surprised to see the valuable content that results from your many interviews.
Having done this literally hundreds of times, I can promise you it really does work.
A case story: I had a client that hooked me up with some executives at his company. He was the one who personally wrote most of the materials that were used by the company. During the interviews with the executives, they were clearly enjoying the process and saying things like, “these interviews are really great,” and “Mike is making us think hard about the reason’s we say what we say.” Now my contact started getting frustrated because he said, “If you had read the materials I had sent, you would see that many of the answers to your questions were in there.” I assured him that this was part of my process and there was a method to my madness. I did read his materials after all the interviews were done. I noticed that the “answers” he mentioned were not really there. If they were, they were so barely mentioned that it would take a master puzzle man to piece them together. After my contact saw the document I delivered, he mentioned he was very pleased with the result. Time spent in interviews, about five one-hour sessions. Time spent reading documents: about two hours. Time surfing the web: zero minutes. Time saved: about eight to ten hours.
Disclaimer: There are circumstances where this approach will not work. For highly technical white papers, you will need to become familiar with the industry terminology. In these cases it makes sense to do a little reading first.
What say you? Do you spend hours reading before interviews or just jump in blind?
If you're new here, be sure to signup for my newsletter and join 20,000 others. Thanks for visiting!
Receive email updates when new articles are posted.>> Related Articles on This Blog






January 21st, 2008 at 2:38 pm
I’ve always spent a lot of time preparing before interviews so that I have valuable questions to ask.
While I can see the benefits of going in blind, I’m wondering if this would require a second interview?
Typically, the more I know about something the more questions I want an expert to answer. Certainly I would learn more from the initial interview, but I believe it would raise more questions once I was able to get my mind around what I had heard.
January 21st, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Hi Chad;
I can understand your concern.
If you only had one interview for the entire project, this might be an issue.
In my case, I have a minimum of 5 interviews for a 10 page white paper project.
The interviews are broken down by topic. This allows a lot of deep discussion on different aspects of the project.
Mike
January 22nd, 2008 at 8:42 am
I call this flying by the seat of my pants. It works well for me, too. Perhaps that is because I have to truly listen to the responses so I don’t sound like an idiot posing the next question.
This does not mean that I am totally unprepared for the meeting. If I was not aware of the person’s responsibilities, role within the company, etc I would be remiss and fall flat on my face.
Due diligence does not always mean hours and hours of pre-reading; however, it can mean sitting still and thinking for 20 minutes about who you are interviewing and what they might bring to the table.
Good information! Thanks again for making us think.
January 22nd, 2008 at 11:37 am
Flying by wire offers opportunities in interviews that seldom come along, concerning both sides. It’s like easing through a swamp in waist deep water. One is not sure if there is a gator underwater or not upahead. But the adventure of interviewing blindly can cultivate one’s mind in creating as you go along. Isn’t the key here to be able to think on your feet in seconds, Mike? I mean, talk about focusing!
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
Shannon and Jim;
To do this you must be very sharp and very fast.
Yes it is an adventure.
However, this is how you find real gold.
It is about engaging with people in regular discussion, yet guiding them down a clear path.
Have you both tried it?
Mike
January 22nd, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I find it the only way to conduct interviews and fact finding missions. If I go too prepared I find that the only answers I get are the predictable ones…but if I go with a rudimentary idea of the information I am seeking I get more usable information.
January 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Though I don’t write white papers (yet), I read your blog because of the great writing suggestions & ideas I find here.
I do a lot of interviews with filmmakers, and they’re for publishing to our website, newsletter and blog.
For those that are controlled by a public relations person and are limited to a short amount of time (12 - 20 minutes), I try to do some research beforehand, including reading current interviews, because I want to find the unique angle that hasn’t been explored.
When I have the chance to spend more time (up to 1 hour) with a subject, I have a few general questions I always ask that seem to get the ball rolling. Then I just talk with them like I’m trying to get to know them personally, and let the conversational ball roll where it may. That has resulted in some really interesting remarks and quotes.
Thanks for sharing your experiences and insights!