<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Optimization Tips And Tricks</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Tips For Beginers</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-61878</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Tips For Beginers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-61878</guid>
		<description>Totally agree, so many people choose their domain name without doing some serious research on keywords, but it is so important for getting easy search rankings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, so many people choose their domain name without doing some serious research on keywords, but it is so important for getting easy search rankings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-60996</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-60996</guid>
		<description>I have a question that I hope someone here can answer.  Does it make a difference whether or not you have your internal linking structure using absolute, relative, or full qualified INTERNAL links?  I ask this because I was researching other peoples rankings on google using 'link:www.domain.com' and it appeared that people using a FULLY QUALIFIED internal links were getting higher ranks than people using regular relative or absolute links.  It looked like google was treating the fully qualified links as external links rather than internal links.... 

Anyone?

-Sheila
&lt;a href="http://www.buytampafl.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tampa Real Estate&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sheila's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TampaRealEstateNews/~3/451158264/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Be Thankful for what you have&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question that I hope someone here can answer.  Does it make a difference whether or not you have your internal linking structure using absolute, relative, or full qualified INTERNAL links?  I ask this because I was researching other peoples rankings on google using &#8216;link:www.domain.com&#8217; and it appeared that people using a FULLY QUALIFIED internal links were getting higher ranks than people using regular relative or absolute links.  It looked like google was treating the fully qualified links as external links rather than internal links&#8230;. </p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
<p>-Sheila<br />
<a href="http://www.buytampafl.com" rel="nofollow">Tampa Real Estate</a></p>
<p><abbr><em>Sheila&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TampaRealEstateNews/~3/451158264/" rel="nofollow">Be Thankful for what you have</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-60144</link>
		<dc:creator>search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-60144</guid>
		<description>Is there really that much emphasis placed on the domain name in Google?  It's pretty obvious that live.com live on that and to a lesser degree yahoo, but google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really that much emphasis placed on the domain name in Google?  It&#8217;s pretty obvious that live.com live on that and to a lesser degree yahoo, but google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romanian Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59896</link>
		<dc:creator>Romanian Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59896</guid>
		<description>Consider two things very important for increasing position in Google serps and for a better Google PR: page titles and website map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider two things very important for increasing position in Google serps and for a better Google PR: page titles and website map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipping Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59622</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipping Websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59622</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article and I thoroughly agree about the keyword rich domain names ranking well on search engines like google. In fact if from the very start you choose well, the amount of link building you need to get high SERP rankings is reduced :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article and I thoroughly agree about the keyword rich domain names ranking well on search engines like google. In fact if from the very start you choose well, the amount of link building you need to get high SERP rankings is reduced <img src='http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tampa Bay Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59352</link>
		<dc:creator>Tampa Bay Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59352</guid>
		<description>We opted to put our last name in our URL and luck for us we have an older domain so ranking for our keywords is doable.  We do have some newer keyword rich domains with dashes in them that are ranking very well as well.   I would always choose keyword rich domain names - even if I had to go .net.  The dashed URLs are not as desirable but they are fine for backup or smaller websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We opted to put our last name in our URL and luck for us we have an older domain so ranking for our keywords is doable.  We do have some newer keyword rich domains with dashes in them that are ranking very well as well.   I would always choose keyword rich domain names - even if I had to go .net.  The dashed URLs are not as desirable but they are fine for backup or smaller websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark.Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59344</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark.Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59344</guid>
		<description>That is an interesting article. In our experience website owners find it difficult to understand visitor behaviour even with good systems such as Google Analytics.

We have recently come across an excellent piece of software that not only allows them to monitor individual user behaviour in real time, but also facilitates direct engagement between visitor and user. This has been increasing conversions by an average of 15% in the websites we have implemented it in.

It seems that the individualised data gives a more enlightening perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting article. In our experience website owners find it difficult to understand visitor behaviour even with good systems such as Google Analytics.</p>
<p>We have recently come across an excellent piece of software that not only allows them to monitor individual user behaviour in real time, but also facilitates direct engagement between visitor and user. This has been increasing conversions by an average of 15% in the websites we have implemented it in.</p>
<p>It seems that the individualised data gives a more enlightening perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatlinburg Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59222</link>
		<dc:creator>Gatlinburg Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-59222</guid>
		<description>Good article.  We have noticed definate changes in the Serps when we optimize our page titles and descriptions.  We still fight the jumbled _20_ characters in some of our interior page names but we are working on that.  We have not used flash or java for a while now.  It slows the site down and the spiders just dont like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  We have noticed definate changes in the Serps when we optimize our page titles and descriptions.  We still fight the jumbled _20_ characters in some of our interior page names but we are working on that.  We have not used flash or java for a while now.  It slows the site down and the spiders just dont like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Proctor</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-58697</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-58697</guid>
		<description>Great advise,  Will be back often and read more interesting thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advise,  Will be back often and read more interesting thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-58604</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/12/07/search-engine-optimization-tips-and-tricks/#comment-58604</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.
I personally use IBP, that compares your pages with the first 10 in the serps giving you great hints on how to optimise a page, and SEO For Firefox, a really nice tool.
I will check out seodigger.com  which I didn't know. Thank you for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.<br />
I personally use IBP, that compares your pages with the first 10 in the serps giving you great hints on how to optimise a page, and SEO For Firefox, a really nice tool.<br />
I will check out seodigger.com  which I didn&#8217;t know. Thank you for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
