<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Paper Landing Page Study Results</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Khalid Hajsaleh</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-58106</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid Hajsaleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-58106</guid>
		<description>Michael,

A 17% conversion rate is excellent for that landing page. I wonder if you could have tweaked the page a little more to drive conversion to a higher percentage. What was the main method of driving traffic to the page (organic, pcc, etc)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>A 17% conversion rate is excellent for that landing page. I wonder if you could have tweaked the page a little more to drive conversion to a higher percentage. What was the main method of driving traffic to the page (organic, pcc, etc)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom  cummings</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-33758</link>
		<dc:creator>tom  cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-33758</guid>
		<description>Good newsletter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good newsletter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger C. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-31064</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger C. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-31064</guid>
		<description>This is extraordinarily useful information. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is extraordinarily useful information. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Romanoff</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-31029</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Romanoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/29/registration-study-2/#comment-31029</guid>
		<description>Your analysis proves what many of us feel in our gut - content beats hype.  The only other thing I would be interested in is a longitudinal analysis.  Do white papers create greater loyalty due the amount of content the visitor gets?  Does it outperform other types of copy over the long haul?  

Thanks for the great info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your analysis proves what many of us feel in our gut - content beats hype.  The only other thing I would be interested in is a longitudinal analysis.  Do white papers create greater loyalty due the amount of content the visitor gets?  Does it outperform other types of copy over the long haul?  </p>
<p>Thanks for the great info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.269 seconds -->
