<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perfect Ad: Leading With Content</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave T</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-60857</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-60857</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

I've used Hoovers and have not been impressed by the information they provided. Harris Selectory seems to do a better job getting quality data.
I believe the information provided is the key, regardless of how the product is promoted.

That being said, a white paper on how to prep for cold calls makes an excellent tool, especially for the new salesperson.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used Hoovers and have not been impressed by the information they provided. Harris Selectory seems to do a better job getting quality data.<br />
I believe the information provided is the key, regardless of how the product is promoted.</p>
<p>That being said, a white paper on how to prep for cold calls makes an excellent tool, especially for the new salesperson.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29658</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29658</guid>
		<description>FYI, I called their media manager and will have more of the story on how this worked for them (hopefully) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, I called their media manager and will have more of the story on how this worked for them (hopefully) <img src='http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29657</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29657</guid>
		<description>Hey Roger - Thanks for your thoughts on this. - Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roger - Thanks for your thoughts on this. - Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger C. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29656</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger C. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29656</guid>
		<description>Dear Mike:
I agree, both with the "content over company" approach as well as the need for a bit more offer clarity. When I first saw it, I wondered if it was "the" vacuum cleaner company, or a consulting firm specializing in sales techniques.

But, upon reflection, I clicked on the banner out of curiosity, which probably proves two things: a) WIFM, i.e., What's In It For Me, is always a winning strategy, and b) curiosity (probably) killed the cat.

Either approach, of course, validates the value of following the steps outlined in your Writing White Papers book. Unless white paper writers carefully structure their white papers as you describe, a poorly structured white paper can destroy a prospect's relationship with a firm before it begins--i.e., by promising one thing, but heavy-handedly delivering another. 

Your "about us" arguments have to show up after your white paper has 
prepared the way and offered genuine, interesting, and concise value. 

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mike:<br />
I agree, both with the &#8220;content over company&#8221; approach as well as the need for a bit more offer clarity. When I first saw it, I wondered if it was &#8220;the&#8221; vacuum cleaner company, or a consulting firm specializing in sales techniques.</p>
<p>But, upon reflection, I clicked on the banner out of curiosity, which probably proves two things: a) WIFM, i.e., What&#8217;s In It For Me, is always a winning strategy, and b) curiosity (probably) killed the cat.</p>
<p>Either approach, of course, validates the value of following the steps outlined in your Writing White Papers book. Unless white paper writers carefully structure their white papers as you describe, a poorly structured white paper can destroy a prospect&#8217;s relationship with a firm before it begins&#8211;i.e., by promising one thing, but heavy-handedly delivering another. </p>
<p>Your &#8220;about us&#8221; arguments have to show up after your white paper has<br />
prepared the way and offered genuine, interesting, and concise value. </p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29651</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom;

Thanks for your feedback.

It seems like your issue comes down to the strength of the copy.

I agree there could be better copy.

What I like however is that the call to action is the actual ad.

I guess I'm gonna have to contact Hoovers and ask them how the ad worked out.

Best Regards, Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom;</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>It seems like your issue comes down to the strength of the copy.</p>
<p>I agree there could be better copy.</p>
<p>What I like however is that the call to action is the actual ad.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m gonna have to contact Hoovers and ask them how the ad worked out.</p>
<p>Best Regards, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29635</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/08/21/hoovers-ad/#comment-29635</guid>
		<description>Gotta say, I'm not 100% on this one. 

Without reading the white paper I'm only guessing at the benefits, but I'd be tempted to shoot for something like "Make 2x the Cold Calls in Half the Time" or "Convert 2x as many cold calls as before" with a "click for a free &lt;i&gt;How to Prep for Cold Calls&lt;/i&gt; White Paper" call to action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta say, I&#8217;m not 100% on this one. </p>
<p>Without reading the white paper I&#8217;m only guessing at the benefits, but I&#8217;d be tempted to shoot for something like &#8220;Make 2x the Cold Calls in Half the Time&#8221; or &#8220;Convert 2x as many cold calls as before&#8221; with a &#8220;click for a free <i>How to Prep for Cold Calls</i> White Paper&#8221; call to action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

