<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results From MAJOR Study of White Papers</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/07/23/techtarget-study/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Hales</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/07/23/techtarget-study/#comment-61645</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Hales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/07/23/techtarget-study/#comment-61645</guid>
		<description>According to this article people are irritated by seeing product information when they were expecting technology to be discussed or that the title misled them to content that was unexpected.  This makes a great case for keeping the executive summary in despite its controversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this article people are irritated by seeing product information when they were expecting technology to be discussed or that the title misled them to content that was unexpected.  This makes a great case for keeping the executive summary in despite its controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
