<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You Kill the Term &#8220;White Paper&#8221;?</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14970</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14970</guid>
		<description>http://www.twowest.com/

If you go through their "challenger quiz" and some other aspects of navigation, it will lead you to the opt-in for one or more of the "orange papers."  It also looks like there's a link directly to them under "Learn."

Carson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.twowest.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.twowest.com/</a></p>
<p>If you go through their &#8220;challenger quiz&#8221; and some other aspects of navigation, it will lead you to the opt-in for one or more of the &#8220;orange papers.&#8221;  It also looks like there&#8217;s a link directly to them under &#8220;Learn.&#8221;</p>
<p>Carson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14969</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14969</guid>
		<description>Carson - Very interesting.  I would love to see the link to that site. - Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carson - Very interesting.  I would love to see the link to that site. - Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14967</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2007/03/16/using-the-term-white-paper/#comment-14967</guid>
		<description>A few days ago, I found a local ad agency's site that was offering "orange papers" for free download.  Their logo/color scheme was orange and they even made a point of mentioning something about how these documents were too interesting/exciting/hot/whatever to be regular ol' white papers.

I'm sure you weren't just talking about changing color designations (ha), but I thought that was an interesting way to breathe a little life into a descriptor that's too often wrongly perceived as being dry or boring.

Personally, I think "white paper" is probably perfect for many settings, but that different terms might play better with other audiences. 

Carson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, I found a local ad agency&#8217;s site that was offering &#8220;orange papers&#8221; for free download.  Their logo/color scheme was orange and they even made a point of mentioning something about how these documents were too interesting/exciting/hot/whatever to be regular ol&#8217; white papers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you weren&#8217;t just talking about changing color designations (ha), but I thought that was an interesting way to breathe a little life into a descriptor that&#8217;s too often wrongly perceived as being dry or boring.</p>
<p>Personally, I think &#8220;white paper&#8221; is probably perfect for many settings, but that different terms might play better with other audiences. </p>
<p>Carson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

