<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Reasons Numbers Still Work in Titles</title>
	<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/</link>
	<description>Everything about writing and marketing white papers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Britton - Excellent points!  That tangible list is something people are drawn to. - Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britton - Excellent points!  That tangible list is something people are drawn to. - Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britton Manasco</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Britton Manasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Numbered lists also are a promise. They promise you a certain outcome. You get the "5 most important" or the "10 greatest." You know what you are going to get before you make the investment of reading -- or tuning in. Where would Letterman be without them? Or Stephen Covey? or Dick Clark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numbered lists also are a promise. They promise you a certain outcome. You get the &#8220;5 most important&#8221; or the &#8220;10 greatest.&#8221; You know what you are going to get before you make the investment of reading &#8212; or tuning in. Where would Letterman be without them? Or Stephen Covey? or Dick Clark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Mario - Great point about implied authority.  - Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mario - Great point about implied authority.  - Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Vellandi</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vellandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Numbered lists are eye catching, and when used as headlines the content seems authoritative no matter if we know the author/publisher or not.  Even if we're skeptical of the content's quality or if it's a subject matter we're already quite familiar with, we're intrigued nonetheless and our curiosity is aroused.  Knowing that the format is a list which we can scan &#38; skim, thus reducing our time investment, we're much greater inclined to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numbered lists are eye catching, and when used as headlines the content seems authoritative no matter if we know the author/publisher or not.  Even if we&#8217;re skeptical of the content&#8217;s quality or if it&#8217;s a subject matter we&#8217;re already quite familiar with, we&#8217;re intrigued nonetheless and our curiosity is aroused.  Knowing that the format is a list which we can scan &amp; skim, thus reducing our time investment, we&#8217;re much greater inclined to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stelzner</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stelzner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>Hey Nathan!

Good point.  

Lists provide a idea of what can be expected BEFORE someone reads the post/article/white paper, etc.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nathan!</p>
<p>Good point.  </p>
<p>Lists provide a idea of what can be expected BEFORE someone reads the post/article/white paper, etc.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Gilliatt</title>
		<link>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Gilliatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.writingwhitepapers.com/blog/2006/11/27/two-reasons-numbers-still-work-in-titles/#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I think numbers work in titles because they identify list articles. Lists are easy to read quickly, and if point #14 doesn't do anything for you, you can move right to point #15. It's not so much the title that works as a general acceptance (or even a preference?) for lists over text-heavy articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think numbers work in titles because they identify list articles. Lists are easy to read quickly, and if point #14 doesn&#8217;t do anything for you, you can move right to point #15. It&#8217;s not so much the title that works as a general acceptance (or even a preference?) for lists over text-heavy articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

